Why Your Money Buys Less Every Year (And It's By Design)

MoneyMan's Avatar
MoneyMan · in Financial News & Discussion
2 comments 304 readers
MoneyMan's Avatar
#1

Today's average wage paid in gold is 50% less than in 1913. In nominal terms you make way more, averaging 70k, but that requires two wage earners to raise a family. If you got paid in gold ounces same as people did in 1913, before the Federal Reserve was authorized, your dollar denominated wage would be a little over $175k.

YouTube

DavidB's Avatar
#2

On Jun 9, 2026, MoneyMan said:

Today's average wage paid in gold is 50% less than in 1913. In nominal terms you make way more, averaging 70k, but that requires two wage earners to raise a family. If you got paid in gold ounces same as people did in 1913, before the Federal Reserve was authorized, your dollar denominated wage would be a little over $175k.

Nuts, crazy statistic. People lived a lot better back then apparently. $175k would be nice even by today's standards.

Last edited by DavidB

MoneyMan's Avatar
#3

On Jun 14, 2026, DavidB said:

Nuts, crazy statistic. People lived a lot better back then apparently. $175k would be nice even by today's standards.

Yup and consider this: In 1964 minimum wage was $1.25 which was 5 quarters. Those silver quarters are now worth $59.15. $59.15 of purchasing power for minimum wage in 1964.

Theme: Emerald Ledger